Divide Already

I want to be kind here, but the news this evening sure is all about how things have never been worse since Carter was president, completely reviled by the public and the world, and war actually going on. And things are worse than that, under the current indifferent office holder.

 

The foolishness in the East is not completely unique. The West has its foolishness, of a completely different kind. After we go our separate ways, and are left to develop on more even footing. When the West can actually invest in infrastructure and laws we can actually AFFORD instead of how some Massachusetts prick finds convenient to their own needs and standards. We don't salt our roads. Our cars don't rust out in 3 years. We care a great deal about water, and wild fires, and landslides. We don't care at all about hurricanes, and we don't really have ice storms. We do get intense rain and landslides. And sometimes, in a few places, floods.

 

I'd like to see the state vote on dividing. On voting to divide. Figure out what the lines are next, but vote to divide first. The poor are really stupid, and they'll assume that the Federal govt will give them Welfare either way. They will be poor and desperate either way. Whether they live in one huge California, or one of 6 California fragments. Or even three Californias.

This is the most rational division. Give or take a county here or there. It would mean re-negotiating water rights. LA gets to be LA, all by its lonesome. Hollywood can finally control a state exactly the way it wants to. And Jefferson can be sufficiently large, with counties that have ALREADY voted to put this on the ballot. Yes, their plan has holes in it, but like Ukraine, they're voting to leave California because the state is both unmanageable and indifferent to rural concerns. Because racists in LA and racists in Hollywood and Racists in Oakland and racists in Berkeley and racists in Fresno and racists in San Diego and racists in Orange County... lots of racists. Everybody has a motivation, an angle, someone to hurt in order to help themselves, a finger to point to. Division enables this, but sticking together has only created more racists, more power struggles, more incompetence and gridlock and abuse.

 

California will be improved by dividing and finding its destiny. The downside of Jefferson is its all about growing dope, and auctioning off the water at a much higher price, to pay for everything else. With control of the two largest dams in the entire state, and three of the biggest rivers (Sacramento, Feather, and Yuba), and a huge amount of money from the rice growing region. If the central state wants a pile of money for port access, then the north will get its own port to export rice through. There's already hostility from one county to another, when people do actual business. Northerners like me hate Angelinos for stealing my water and taxes. They have better roads than we do, and they make sure the illegals can vote. Several times. Because voting illegals keep all the money in the state going there. Divide the state and suddenly the cheating votes won't mean a thing to us anymore. The anger will end. The hostility will be over. New lines will allow us to be better neighbors, and ignore the crap they do. It won't be our problem anymore. Their choices are not our responsibility when there's a border between us.

 

And maybe the rest of the nation will see how dividing helped us settle down and end the hatreds between us, be removing power by racists over their chosen hatreds. All those haters in New York City won't be able to tell us what to do in Reno or Spokane or even in Marysville. Twin Falls has nothing in common with Hollywood. We don't need to hear the opinions of Actors about how to deal with vicious mother-eating grizzly bears. And the hint: its not giving them big hugs. Or understanding their feelings. This is why Hollywood needs to stick to what its good at. Or isn't good at anymore. Remaking movies endlessly suggests they aren't good at it anymore.

Look at the blue spots, and look at the everywhere red. America is divided, and everyone in the red areas feels cheated by those in the blue. Now remember where the food grows. There's some in the Mississippi River Valley, and some in a few other places. But mostly? Notice any correlation between color and food supply? Think of all the ways the libs won't have to work when all the field hicks are living their chosen way, not polluting the perfect leftist cities. The ones that have to buy their food from those redneck hicks they openly despise. I wonder what they'd charge? Or if leftist money is worth a thing when push comes to shove?

Something to think about.